In the commercial landscape, the “corporate veil” is often seen as an impenetrable shield. Directors and shareholders generally operate under the comfort that a company is a separate legal entity, meaning they are not personally liable for the company’s debts. However, this shield is frequently bypassed by a single, often overlooked document: the Personal Suretyship.
For many directors, particularly those of Small to Medium Enterprises (SMEs), signing a suretyship is a standard requirement for securing bank loans, credit facilities with suppliers, or commercial leases. While it may seem like a “formality,” it is one of the most significant legal risks a director can undertake.
1. What is a Personal Suretyship?
A suretyship is a contract in terms of which a person (the surety) binds themselves to a creditor for the performance of the obligations of a third party (the principal debtor, in this case, the company).
If the company fails to pay its debts or meets a financial dead-end, the creditor does not need to wait for the company to be liquidated to come after the director. They can move directly against the director’s personal assets, including their home, vehicles, and savings.
2. The “Hidden” Clauses: Renouncing Legal Benefits
Most standard suretyship agreements drafted by banks and large suppliers include the renunciation of certain legal benefits. By signing, directors often unknowingly waive:
-
The Benefit of Excussion (beneficium excussionis): This usually requires the creditor to first exhaust all legal remedies against the company before turning to the surety. By renouncing this, you allow the creditor to sue you simultaneously with, or even before, the company.
-
The Benefit of Division (beneficium divisionis): If there are multiple directors/sureties, this benefit would normally allow you to only be liable for your pro-rata share. Renouncing it means you are “jointly and severally” liable for the entire debt.
3. The Matrimonial Property Act Trap
A critical, often-missed risk involves directors married In Community of Property. Under Section 15(2)(h) of the Matrimonial Property Act 88 of 1984, a spouse may not bind the joint estate as a surety without the written consent of the other spouse.
If a director signs a suretyship without their spouse’s written consent, the agreement may be voidable. However, there is a major exception: if the suretyship is signed “in the ordinary course of the spouse’s profession, trade, or business,” consent may not be required. This “ordinary course of business” exception is a frequent source of litigation in our courts and can lead to the entire joint estate, including the non-signing spouse’s assets, being attached by creditors.
4. The “Continuing” Nature of Liability
Many suretyships are “continuing” covers. This means the director remains liable for all present and future debts of the company.
A common pitfall occurs when a director resigns or sells their shares. Simply leaving the company does not automatically cancel the suretyship. Unless the director formally requests a written release from the creditor and the creditor accepts it, that director could be sued years later for debts incurred by the company long after they have moved on.
Protecting Yourself: A Checklist for Directors
Before signing any document presented by a creditor, consider the following:
-
Limit the Amount: Do not sign an unlimited suretyship. Insist on a “limited” suretyship where your liability is capped at a specific Rand value.
-
Limit the Duration: Request that the suretyship only applies for a specific period or for a specific transaction.
-
The Exit Clause: Ensure there is a clear provision stating that you can be released from the suretyship upon resignation, subject to the company providing a replacement surety or the debt being below a certain level.
-
Spousal Consent: If you are married in community of property, ensure you understand how the signature affects your joint estate and whether formal consent is required to protect your spouse.
Personal suretyships are powerful legal instruments that effectively strip away the protection of a private company. They should never be signed under pressure or without a full understanding of the long-term implications. For any director, the cost of a legal review of a suretyship agreement is a fraction of the cost of losing personal assets to a corporate debt.
by Jaques van den Ende